Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 04:40 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > And I would argue that having the user interface swing wildly in design
> > & implementation based on "the current composition of an elected board
> > that is refreshed in part every six months" is not the sort of
> > situation that Fedora would want to be in anyway.
>
> That's a very lame excuse for sticking with an awful desktop environment
> as the default just because it is the status quo.
Not excellent...please avoid insulting other people's hard work just
because you are working on something else.
You got the causality wrong: It's not that I call GNOME "awful" because I
work on KDE, but that I work on KDE because GNOME does not fulfill my needs
and expectations at all. (Even GNOME 2 didn't, but GNOME 3 went even further
away from it.)
Kevin Kofler