On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 10:01 AM Jakub Jelinek <jakub(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 09:51:42AM -0700, John Reiser wrote:
> > it's clear there's a documentation problem [with DT_GNU_HASH]
> Partly due to lack of documentation, already I have seen "abuses"
So what is
https://akkadia.org/drepper/dsohowto.pdf
https://sourceware.org/legacy-ml/binutils/2006-10/msg00377.html
https://flapenguin.me/elf-dt-gnu-hash
then?
I'm sorry, which point were you trying to prove with these links?
->
https://akkadia.org/drepper/dsohowto.pdf
This is a ~50 page document, of which one page refers to DT_GNU_HASH,
and only contains a short description of how to use it.
-
https://sourceware.org/legacy-ml/binutils/2006-10/msg00377.html
This is a mailing list post by you, and you wrote:
"""but for the final specification I'm afraid you need to read
binutils and/or libc sources."""
-
https://flapenguin.me/elf-dt-gnu-hash
This looks like a reverse-engineering effort of the binary DT_GNU_HASH
format based on the source code - it starts with:
"""The problem with it is that DT_GNU_HASH is not documented anywhere
other than in GNU binutils and glibc source code."""
Fabio