Alan Dunn wrote:
I would like to use PPL 0.10 in packages for F9 and (more
importantly)
F10, and have been directed to ask whether anyone else minds this
change. It is currently only in rawhide. It does require an soname
bump (libppl.so.6 -> libppl.so.7), however, it appears that the only
packages that rely on this are the subpackages of the package itself.
In that case (and Alex Lancaster's repoquery confirmed it) there's no
problem whatsoever with just upgrading it.
Upstream has merely to submit the change as an update (and would
also
like to do so:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463742).
Tell them to go ahead.
Kevin Kofler