On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 11:34 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Adam Williamson (awilliam(a)redhat.com) said:
> > The 'not separating the scripts into a separate subpackage' bit.
>
> Ah. I thought the point of separating them wasn't to allow for multiple
> init systems, but because our current guidance was to use sysvinit
> scripts by default, not upstart scripts; so with them separated off, you
> only get the upstart native script if you manually install it.
The referenced packages aren't using upstart jobs as a replacement for
traditional SysV service scripts... they're using upstart for things that
don't really fit in the service paradigm.
Ah, I see, that makes sense then. Thanks.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net