V Tue, May 10, 2022 at 08:23:17AM -0000, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki napsal(a):
> I somehow don't understand why there should be anything like
"unused
> source files". Why is something like this even possible?
1. Grab a package
2. Edit the spec file in a way that changes which sources are used (say, update to a new
version)
3. Do not run "fedpkg new-sources" to upload the new tarballs
4. The "sources" file now lists files that are not actually used by the spec
Here I do these two additional steps:
4.1. Review thew new sources for new licenses, usually by comparing them to
the old sources.
4.2. Run "fedpkg new-sources" because now I know the sources are
license-acceptable and because it prevents me from forgetting to run
"fedpkg new-sources" before pushing commits to dist-git.
5. Run "fedpkg mockbuild"
6. Mockbuild attempts to download package sources
Here I do rsync to a virtual machine and "fedpkg local" there. But I
guess it
does not differ much from "fedpkg mockbuild".
-- Petr