On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 12:49, Havoc Pennington wrote:
On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 11:34, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Indeed I cannot find an official definition of the term Open Source as
> used for the Fedora Project on the Fedora Red Hat pages or on the Fedora
> US pages. It is probably a good idea to make explicit which definition
> is used.
We have discussed in the past using the intersection of the open source
definition from
opensource.org and the free software definition from
gnu.org, which means "only software the two major definitions agree is
open/free"
Anyway, we should not turn this list into a gnu.misc.discuss type of
morass (for those of us who remember the days of gnu.misc.discuss... for
all I know it still exists, but I haven't been on usenet in a few
years... ;-))
I think they all moved to debian-legal.
Havoc
--
Stephen John Smoogen smoogen(a)lanl.gov
Los Alamos National Lab CCN-5 Sched 5/40 PH: 4-0645
Ta-03 SM-1498 MailStop B255 DP 10S Los Alamos, NM 87545
-- "We cannot have a free government without elections; and if the
-- rebellion could force us to forgo, or postpone, a national election,
-- it might fairly claim to have already conquered us." Abraham Lincoln