On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 11:34 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 14:46 +0200, Matthias Saou wrote:
> Am I the only one that it kind of bothers to not see java stuff using a
> dedicated namespace for the package names? Things like "gnu.regexp" seem
> totally wrong... not to mention the dot in the name for that particular
> one.
No you're not alone in that Matthias...
If you want, bring this up with the JPackage folk since that's where the
names are coming from.
Since when did FC start to follow whatever somebody else does?
It's not any different for java, "gnu.regexp" is simply a bad name for a
java-only library (or whatever they're called in the java-land).
Just imagine all the perl-modules in FC without perl-prefix:
- XML-SAX
- TimeDate
- HTML-Parser
... etc. I think you get the idea.
- Panu -