On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 13:17 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:30:57 +0100
Michael Schwendt <mschwendt(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > In this case I have gdl 0.9-0.pre6.fc9. It got bumped to
> > 0.9-1.pre6.fc9. It should be 0.9-0.pre6.fc9.1.
>
> However, it should have been
>
> 0.9-0.1.pre6%{?dist}
> ^^
> (!)
>
> to begin with, not
>
> 0.9-0.pre6%{?dist}
that is correct. Your original scheme did not follow the guidelines,
thus the bumper didn't deal with it as if it were a pre-release.
Please follow the guidelines next time.
I have also noticed that all the jpp based java packages have been
updated incorrectly, and those are following the fedora jpackage package
naming guidelines:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/JPackagePolicy
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list