Re: Best practice for local files in a package
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 at 14:26, Bruno Wolff III <bruno(a)wolff.to> wrote:
I got a warning about not having urls for a couple of files in the
squashfs-tools package from release monitoring.
The bug which has the comment is:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747102
These are based on some man pages used in Debian at one time, but do not
track changes in the originals. I need to look at these again since 4.4
has a number of new options. And I'm wondering what I should do to not
break test release monitoring builds for files in the package that are local
and not derived from (on an ongoing basis) an upstream?
I got a similar one for nagios. I am wondering if it would make sense
to put these in some git repo and just point the source to that but no
idea
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
Stephen J Smoogen.