Lubomir Kundrak wrote:
Thank you two for supporting the biggest troll under the sun. Have
you
spent a minute skimming through what nonsense did the file bugs for?
Have you ever notices what does he do to this list by looking a bit to
the history? Have you ever seen anything technically relevant from him?
A patch?
And -- are you also interested about list entry about each bug that
interests me? [1] with a mail about each update? No? Why?
[1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?query_format=&short_desc_type...
&ch
angedin=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 11:27 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> Richard Hally wrote:
> <SNIP>
>> There are more people than the reporter and the "owners of respective
>> components" that have a interest in these kinds of things and we would
>> like to know that someone else has also seen the problem and done
>> something about it. Now we can follow or discuss the matter in an open
>> way rather than have the discussion buried in bugzilla.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Richard
>>
> +1
>
> The list is much easier to skim thru than bzs to see if there is
> anything "brewing" in Fedora land.
>
> --
> __________________________
> Regards,
>
> Old Fart
>
Now you are trolling!
Criticizing other peoples posts to an open(not moderated) list other than to say
it is off topic is a waste of bandwidth. The original post was not off-topic but
yours was!
But to answer your troll, I learned something by reading the responses to the RFEs.
Your list looks like you need to find something you can do well and narrow your
focus to it.
HTH
Richard