tor 2010-06-03 klockan 19:31 +0100 skrev Alex Hudson:
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 12:29 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway
wrote:
> On 06/03/2010 11:54 AM, Iain Arnell wrote:
> > And slightly weird that it's okay for Red Hat to distribute it
> > themselves, both commercially and as open source from
jboss.org, but
> > it's questionable for Fedora.
>
> I can't speak on what Red Hat does on a larger scale. I do know that it
> is important to me and Fedora that we do it properly, or not at all.
If everyone else is distributing JBoss, though, that calls into question
whether it's Fedora doing it "properly".
Worrying about a set of rights which are unwaivable seems on the face of
it to be exhibiting an abundance of over-caution, and it seems
particularly sad that Fedora is losing out having to refrain from
distributing another Red Hat-sponsored project.
It's not sad. It means the Fedora project will do the work to clean up a
mess which most other don't even see. It's problematic, in a way, sure,
but "sad" is really not the right word.
/Alexander