On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> wrote:
It would be really helpful if instead of calling programs
"unmaintainable" and similar non-sense you would research a bit what
really is the problem ... take a look at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&remaction=run&namedcmd=all%20NEW%20abrt%
20crashes&sharer_id=74116 ... that's 1473 NEW untriaged abrt bugs.
There is absolutely no permission required. I saw plenty of patches
which
were accepted upstream and just few which were rejected with always
clearly stated reasons (not that I agree with all of those reasons, but
again before calling Firefox proprietary product, it would be nice to
educate yourself).
Concerning CLOSED/UPSTREAM resolution ... again, I am not happy with it
myself, but instead of calling MoFo proprietary a bit of patches (this
time on bugs
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400598, https://
bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=294608,
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/
show_bug.cgi?id=356853, and
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?
id=569371) would be helpful. How is your Perlfoo? See what I wrote on
this theme before (
http://article.gmane.org/
gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/79936/) and feel free to provide patches
for some better solution of the situation. I can assure you, that well
written patches will be welcomed upstream.
Maybe you want to maintain iceweasel & co. in Fedora? Good luck, but not
for me, thanks.
At least with iceweasel, those bugs you pointed out can be fixed by
Fedora and not have to wait months in the queue over at Mozilla, if
they even bother accepting them. Iceweasel would also allow us to use
openSUSE's KDE patchset for deep integration, something Mozilla says
violates trademark law by patching and distributing. NON FREE