On Friday, 04 December 2020 at 17:20, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 12:55 PM Miro HronĨok
<mhroncok(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> For what's it worth I think that packages that only use make via cmake should
> not have an explcit dependency on make. Packages that use make directly should
> have an explicit dependency on make (even if they already BR cmake).
Does that mean that if the requires: make that is currently
in the cmake package that was added due to rhbz#1862014
is removed (as has been proposed since ninja is a valid
alternative) that you are fine with packagers having to go
fix their packages? Or would you expect another pass
across all packages to add a BR: make to be done? If
the later, it makes sense to me to do it once (when
someone is willing to do the work) to prepare for any
cmake cleanup(s).
Wouldn't this work for cmake?
Requires: (make or ninja)
Suggests: make
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora
https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion
http://rpmfusion.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
-- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan