Dne 22. 09. 20 v 10:47 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
On 22. 09. 20 10:29, Michael J Gruber wrote:
>> Dne 21. 09. 20 v 18:37 Michael J Gruber napsal(a):
>>
>>
>> No, please not! It is just build dependency. I have orphaned the
>> package
>> to have it removed from Fedora. May be I should have retire it instead,
>> but I wanted to give change if somebody have some real reason to
>> have it
>> in Fedora.
>>
>>
>> Vít
>
> Well, "just a build dependency" means it makes other packages FTBFS.
It does not. At least not immediately.
> Often, noone notices that until the mass rebuild shortly before
a
> release beta.
>
> I've already built and pushed it to avoid these problems at the worst
> possible time. It's merely a matter of adjusting the expected test
> output to the new ruby minor version (which has changed strings). And
> my plan is still to retire it, but not without filling bugs for the
> dependent packages before so that they get a chance to switch to
> erubi (no "s").
That is just rubygem-asciidoctor with this PR:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-asciidoctor/pull-request/4
No Bugzillas are needed.
Yes, I have tried to make sure everything is fixed prior orphaning
rubygem-erubis. You can check F32 dependencies vs Rawide. The
rubygem-asciidoctor is the only one which was recently without response
and I expect that Todd was just busy recently, but I have no doubts this
would be resolved prior it become issue.
Vít