On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 23:36, Adam Williamson <awilliam(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 14:23 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 14:10 +0100, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> > Hello Testers and rawhide Users,
> >
> > Fedora 17 will locate the entire base operating system in /usr. The directories
> > /bin, /sbin, /lib, /lib64 will only be symlinks:
> > /bin → /usr/bin
> > /sbin → /usr/sbin
> > /lib → /usr/lib
> > /lib64 → /usr/lib64
>
> I've just tested building a live image from the /usr move repository. It
> boots, and the /usr move changes appear to be implemented. I'm currently
> testing if it can be installed successfully.
>
> One thing I already noticed is that there seems to be a problem with the
> ntfs-3g executables. /bin/ntfs-3g seems to be a symlink to itself - it
> shows as "/bin/ntfs-3g -> /bin/ntfs-3g" in ls output. Trying to do
'ls
> -l /usr/bin/ntfs-3g' results in 'cannot access /usr/bin/ntfs-3g: Too
> many levels of symbolic links'. /bin/ntfsmount is similarly affected.
>
> On a pre-/usr move system it seems that these executables are actually
> located in /bin but have symlinks in /usr/bin - /usr/bin/ntfs-3g is a
> symlink to /bin/ntfs-3g . Perhaps the existence of these symlinks
> in /usr/bin confused things?
Oh, for some reason, we missed to add ntfs-3g to the packages in the
f17-usrmove repo. The unconverted package contains:
/usr/bin/ntfs-3g -> /bin/ntfs-3g
which needs to be fixed to work properly for the usrmove.
Installation fails at partitioning stage, with udisksd hitting
"Error
opening /etc/crypttab file: Failed to open file '/etc/crypttab': No such
file or directory (g-file-error-quark, 4)"
The file /etc/crypttab indeed doesn't exist. I'm not sure if this is
actually specific to the /usr move stuff, but it does prevent me being
able to ensure that installation works from a /usr-moved live image. I
have a non-usr-move image also, I'll test install with that.
Sounds unlikely that this is related. But tests should show.
Unrelated: Do you know if the installer uses udisks? If, it should
probably switch to the current udisks2, because udisks will not much
longer be supported, and we should people give a note about that.
Thanks,
Kay