On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 07:45:46PM -0500, Stan Bubrouski wrote:
On Wed, 2003-12-17 at 18:13, Alan Cox wrote:
> Pine isnt in Fedora anyway 8)
I've never liked pine, but I've always found pico to be quite useful,
any chance of it being included, or are there licenese problems with
including it at all?
See "nano" instead