Am 05.05.2014 22:19, schrieb Simo Sorce:
On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 22:03 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl(a)thelounge.net> wrote:
>> Am 05.05.2014 21:45, schrieb Kay Sievers:
>>> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> And calling /usr/libexec "Fedora-only" is of course kind of
>>>> funny.
>>>
>>> "libexec" is Fedora-only, no other major distro used it, not even
LSB
>>> allowed it.
>
>> you systemd-guys are really funny - /run was okay and FHS did
>> not matter because it don't get often enough updates and was in
>> your way, libexec is not OK because you don't like itand prefer
>> to fix things which ain't broken - wheter it's part of a proposed
>> FHS update and from where it comes
>
> It is not about being funny, it is about making reasonable decisions.
> /run solved a huge old problem, libexec is pointless and only creates
> needless and nothing but annoying differences.
It's a practical way to keep helpers out of path and autocomplete
without polluting /usr/lib[64] and having to deal with multilib issues,
what's pointless about it?
that it was not proposed by systemd-upstream
(sorry could not resist)