Re: RFC: Disabling blinking cursor by default
Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 01:29:05AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>> Le mardi 03 février 2009 à 17:24 +0100, Tomasz Torcz a écrit :
>>
>>> Uhm, sorry? The talk was of about 1-2W. Given that my Thinkpad T400
>>> could go to 10,3W when idle
>> But when it's idle, you are in screensaver or blank screen with no
>> cursor anyway. The "wins" are massively overhyped,
> Agreed.
>
> I think it's time to demand measurement procedures such that people can
> reproduce this claim.
Those were already provided.
Are you referring to Felix Miata's table?
To me these read more as a joke but real defined testing scenarios.
Ralf