Once upon a time, Chris Adams <cmadams(a)hiwaay.net> said:
Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett <mjg59(a)srcf.ucam.org> said:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:57:13AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett <mjg59(a)srcf.ucam.org> said:
> > > No package should be automatically changing the sysrq policy.
> >
> > Why not?
> >
> > For example, I use a commercial backup program that makes extensive use
> > of IPC and needs the msgmni and msgmnb limits raised beyond the default
> > values. Why shouldn't they be able to include that change in their RPM?
>
> Where did I say they shouldn't?
You mean other than the quoted line?
My appologies; I misread "sysrq" as "sysctl".
--
Chris Adams <cmadams(a)hiwaay.net>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.