On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Till Maas <opensource(a)till.name> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 01:16:43PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> I would like to collect feedback on this issue. If you want to disable
> direct stable pushes, why? Could there be a less radical solution to that
> problem (e.g. a policy discouraging direct stable pushes for some specific
> types of changes rather than a blanket ban)? On the other hand, if (like me)
> you DON'T want that feature to go away, please provide valid use cases.
Imho it takes too long to get packages into updates-testing
+1
--
LG Thomas
Dubium sapientiae initium