Le lun. 25 janv. 2021 à 12:29, Kamil Paral <kparal(a)redhat.com> a écrit :
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 11:17 AM Graham White <graham_alton(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to get to the bottom of bug #1901065 -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901065
>
> Anyone know why PackageKit-gtk3-module.i686 has been removed from the Fedora 33
repositories? This package was there for Fedora 32 and checking Koji it looks like the
32-bit version is still being built. However, for some reason it's not appearing in
the F33 repositories for the x86_64 architecture. We have some packages that rely on the
32-bit version so it would be good to have it re-included in the repo.
Multilib detection (which i686 packages should end up in x86_64 repos) is done in Pungi.
There is some heuristics which I haven't found documented anywhere (one would think it
should be in the packaging docs). A whitelisting of some package can be requested here:
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/issues
However, as you can see, the maintainers don't respond much to such requests :-(
Perhaps Mohan, Kevin or others could shed a light here how to best make sure those
requests are noticed? Thanks.
The logical is about, any -devel sub-packages are copied for both
multilibs arches, then only the additional "arched" dependencies (with
%{?_isa}) are computed from the -devel.i686 one.
I can suggest a fix that will add theses dependencies in the
glib-devel sub-package (1), but maybe it will be more relevant to
restore an empty PackageKit-devel and add these here.
I expect it's valuable to have the logic for multilibs, "self
contained" in the package instead of to rely on any infra tweaks.
(1)
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/PackageKit/pull-request/7