On 03/02/2010 05:48 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 05:13 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>> Well, the only positive impact bodhi had on me was bodhi implementing a
>>> more or less usable web-frontend, where Fedora had nothing in place
>>> before. This doesn't mean it is a good system and even less does this
>>> mean this system is perfect or bug-free.
>>>
>> Didn't I just get done saying it's not perfect or bug-free, but that
>> doesn't mean the sensible answer is to burn it down?
>>
> I didn't say "burn it down"!!
>
> Bluntly put, I am saying "karma is dysfunctional/conceptionally
> inapplicable", the "web GUI leaves much to be desired", "there is
no
> usable CLI" and "koji/bodji" integration sucks" ... but this is
> off-topic, here.
>
You said 'Abandon it (I don't think this would change anything wrt. to
QA in Fedora)', which sounds like 'burn it down' to me.
Oh, could it be
there is a misunderstanding?
The "it", I was referring to was "karma-voting".
I don't see any sense in keeping "karma-voting" and consider
"abandoning
karma-voting" to be no loss to Fedora. I never intended to say "abandon
bodhi".
Ralf