On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 2:52 PM Ali Erdinc Koroglu
<aekoroglu(a)linux.intel.com> wrote:
On 27/05/2023 15:18, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Kevin Fenzi:
>
>> Today we have packager groups used in
src.fedoraproject.org to allow a
>> group of people to maintain packages. In the past this has been used for
>> SIGs/packaging areas. ie, python-packaging-sig or robotics-sig or the
>> like.
>>
>> FESCo has been asked about creating company related groups.
>> (
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2966 and
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2929 )
>> ie, foocorp-sig / foocopr-packagers. These groups would then be used to
>> help maintain packages that foocorp finds of interest/value.
>
> Will these groups automatically make members part of the packager group?
> Or will that be a separate step?
I think this can be like that: "To join the foocorp-SIG, packager group membership
is a requirement"
IMO, we should not call these SIGs either. I'm not sure exactly what
the naming convention should be, but one thought would be
"corp-maint_<corpname>" (or flip it around if you wish).
e.g., "corp-maint_aiven" for Aiven employees.
--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!