On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 4:33 AM Christopher <ctubbsii(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
Those are bugs filed against RPM. Is the RPM package responsible for
executing lsetfilecon, or is it the grub2 package? If the grub2
package, it seems to me that they should know that EFI partitions will
never support lsetfilecon and they should never try. If it's RPM, then
it looks like it is suppressed upstream and the fix will be
incorporated eventually. I guess I don't know which component is
actually responsible for causing the execution of lsetfilecon.
You're right, but there is discussion of the grub2 issue in bug
1722766. A number of bugs have been filed against grub2 specifically:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1819817
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827922
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829137
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830399
So far, though, no word from the maintainer on those bugs.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/