Re: Allow comments and discussion even though an update was pushed to stable

> "Johannes Lips" <johannes.lips(a)gmail.com&gt; writes: > > > We already have a tool for reporting issues and problems, and it's not > bodhi. If there's a problem with an already pushed update, it needs to > be in bugzilla - where it's actually discoverable - not in bodhi, where > it will go nowhere. I am not intending to use bodhi as a bug tracker, but I would like to be able to reference issues, which were introduced with an update and I don't really see a lot of negative effects of this. I think it's a way to make issues in bugzilla more easily traceable, since if an update is closely related with a new bug it is easier to just look into bodhi first and see if the issue affected others as well. If by chance the first reporter of a bug is too late in bodhi this connection is simply lost. I don't see it as bodhi replacing bugzilla, but rather as an additional entry point, when looking for known issues in close relation with a bug.