Re: More Fedora mock breakage

Bastien Nocera writes: > On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 18:48 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> [ consults CVS... ]  So XZ support in F-11's rpm is less than a week >> old, there is *no* support in F-10, and we're already requiring >> the capability in order to do useful development work? >> All I can say is WTF. > An rpm with Xz support is in F11 updates-testing. I'm pretty sure it's > also in updates-testing for F10. It is not in F-10's package CVS, let alone in updates-testing.  Yes, I looked before complaining.  This was not well-managed.