On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 08:25 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 05:02:41AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> Axel Thimm wrote:
>>
>>> Whether it's "incorrectly" or not is up to the eye of the
beholder,
>>> and FWIW README.distribution is serving neither side of the
>>> grammar. Or is this package really going to be used in a
>>> "distribution"? I'm quite sure it will be.
>> Distribution is just a off hand suggestion. Feel free to come up with a
>> better name like others have suggested.
>
> How about README.Fedora?
+1
Axel, Don't waste everyone's time.
Rahul, you are
wasting our time, by having made an issue from a
non-issue. Users aren't as dumb as you seem to think.
Ralf