Am Donnerstag, den 03.01.2008, 02:03 -0600 schrieb Douglas McClendon:
Douglas McClendon wrote:
[ pro-tux-on-ice rant snipped ]
> might be time for me to go back to tux-on-ice. I truly am disgusted by
> having to suffer through 5-15 seconds of thrashing while changing
> desktops after resume. I would much rather the resume take 20 seconds
> longer, and present me with a good user experience. (yes, I am one of
> those people that thinks that offering early login while the system
> finishes booting is a really stupid thing).
To clarify this harsh, theoretically offensive statement- Early login
done _right_ would be fine. Doing it the incomplete way, such as the
vista experience,
I don't know why people keep saying this. Vista boots fast and is
responsive.
is IMO a regression, not a feature. I.e. it boggles
my mind that fast boot-to-login time is perceived as so valuable, that
the implementers will let a user's first experience with the system be
at its absolute valley(anti-peak) responsiveness phase.
I guess for early login this isn't so bad, as people just learn that the
fast boot time is an illusion and that it's better to sit back and let
the system IO settle before using it. But what started my rant was the
swsusp choice, which is not workaroundable by just letting the system IO
settle.
and the 5-15 seconds was a bit of an exageration, more like 5-10. But
still, evocative of winblowz 3.1 swap thrashing....
</rant>
-dmc