On 12/4/20 4:55 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 12/3/20 6:27 PM, Tom Stellard wrote:
> However, in the discussion on the mailing list for this change, not
> everyone agreed that cmake should Require make and this point was
> never resolved. So, since there is still ambiguity here, I am
> planning to do the safest option, which is to add BuildRequires: make
> even for packages that use %cmake_build and do not invoke make directly.
For what's it worth I think that packages that only use make via cmake
should not have an explcit dependency on make. Packages that use make
directly should have an explicit dependency on make (even if they
already BR cmake).
OK, so is it safe to assume then that the cmake package will always
Require either make or ninja?
-Tom