Dne 26. 09. 22 v 20:52 Robby Callicotte via devel napsal(a):
On Monday, September 26, 2022 2:41:14 AM CDT Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Hi Robby,
>
> Do you by a chance have repository, e.g. in Copr, of all the things you
> eventually want import into Fedora? Or bugzilla tracker for kitchen-salt
> / test-kitchen which all the reviews would be blocked against? I am
> asking, because introducing bigger component into Fedora might be quite
> challenging and it is not actually visible for other contributors what
> is your goal.
>
> As an example, I have noticed that you have opened rubygem-rexml review
> ticket [1]. But this should not be necessary, because rubygem-rexml is
> subpackage of ruby package.
>
> So such repository / tracker could help provide bigger picture and
> possibly save some work on your side.
>
>
> Vít
>
>
> [1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129584
>
>
> Dne 24. 09. 22 v 21:41 Robby Callicotte via devel napsal(a):
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>>
>> I would like to unretire rubygem-logging[1]. It is a dependency of the
>> yet to be built kitchen-salt provisioner for test-kitchen. I have
>> opened a bz[2] and a releng ticket[3] for review.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> [1] -
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-logging
>> [2] -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129557
>> [3] -
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11046
Hello Vit,
I have built all the components in my home lab, but I will set up a copr for
test-kitchen. I was trying to work my way up from the lower dependencies for
test-kitchen.
Understood.
This is why I started with logging, hashie, etc. I will open a
bug tracking ticket for this after getting everything loaded into Copr. All
total, test-kitchen looks to have 29+ dependencies to build.
Nice, thx!
I will also close
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129584 since
this is already in ruby. I simply did a search in
src.fedoraproject.org and
did not see this package. Sorry bout that.
No worries :) Glad to save you some work ;)
Vít