Re: Koji (was: Re: F29 Self Contained Change: Deprecate YUM 3)
On 07/14/2018 09:14 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 10:15:38AM +0200, Daniel Mach wrote:
>> koji
>>
>> koji is kinda important. I think this is meaning python2-koji?
>> I would hope python3-koji/koji stays around?
>>
> ditto
I don't understand, will Koji still work or not?
My understanding (and I hope koji developers/maintainers will jump in if
I am wrong here) is that koji as client should work fine. koji as
server/hub still needs work to no longer need yum.
See: https://pagure.io/koji/issue/971
I was told (I don't know for sure) that this change will break
Koji.
We're using Koji on top of Fedora 29 to build Fedora/RISC-V.
We'd love to use dnf instead of yum of course, but it seems like Koji
uses a bunch of yum APIs, rather than just using the yum command line
tool,so I've no idea how much work it's going to be to fix that.
Yeah, Fedora Infrastructure's koji instances are rhel, so they should
hopefully keep working. Unfortunately, I see from the above ticket that
this also affects kojid, which is going to hit us. ;(
So yeah, it would be very nice to have that fixed up before we drop yum.
kevin
Attachments:
- signature.asc (application/pgp-signature — 833 bytes)