Re: yum+ldconfig
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 07:22:31PM +0200, dragoran wrote:
ok than change it in rpm (there should be no diff.) the result would
be
in both cases faster updates.
Bad idea either. What about the following:
package A is installed/upgraded
%post A: runs ldconfig
package B is installed/upgraded
%post B: uses utility of A that needs a library of A
There is no magic intelligence that could see if the %post install
can be postponed, because a subsequent installed package may need
its result (even that of ldconfig) during its installation.
B.t.w., did you measure what (percentage of) time could be won when
collecting the ldconfig calls? I really don't think it's worth the
pain...
--
-- Jos Vos <jos(a)xos.nl>
-- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364
-- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204