On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 04:06:18PM +0200, Petr Ĺ abata wrote:
> > Hmmm, so, if I want some random utility (let's say gcal, which I don't
> > package, or calc, which I do) on my server, what are my options? Can I
[...]
> The modular release is effectively a separate distro.
>
> While using single RPMs from traditional Fedora might work in
> most cases, I wouldn't recommend enabling the entire repository
> which also provides packages conflicting with (and possibly
> updating) those provided by modules.
>
> Creating logical modules would be the best approach here.
> Containers are also an option but someone needs to make them, too.
So, would a "Random Command-Line Tools" module make sense? Sort of like
the old "system-tools" comps group? That's a grab bag of stuff like
screen, setserial, nmap, xdelta, htop, and a whole bunch more.
How do you come to a consensus on what people believe are must
have/critical "Random Command-Line Tools" that "make sense"? I
suspect
everyone will have a differing opinion there.
Peter