>>>> "AJ" == Adam Jackson
<ajackson(a)redhat.com> writes:
AJ> Openchrome appears to be a complete superset of the existing via
AJ> driver, which is unmaintained and in some cases actively broken.
AJ> So I have no problem with openchrome actively claiming devices.
So then should the existing via driver stop claiming them? Otherwise
don't we start running into unspecified behavior when multiple .xinf
files claim a device?
- J<