Change in ownership over the last 168 hours ===========================================
19 packages were orphaned ------------------------- msmtp [EL-5,devel,f17,f18,f19] was orphaned by turki SMTP client https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/msmtp mysql-connector-c++ [devel] was orphaned by remi MySQL database connector for C++ https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/mysql-connector-c++ PyOpenGL [devel,f17,f18,f19] was orphaned by turki Python bindings for OpenGL https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/PyOpenGL openstack-tempo [EL-6,devel,f17,f18,f19] was orphaned by mdomsch OpenStack RESTful API to cron https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/openstack-tempo php-pecl-apc [devel] was orphaned by remi APC caches and optimizes PHP intermediate code https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/php-pecl-apc bpython [EL-6] was orphaned by mdomsch Fancy curses interface to the Python interactive interpreter https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/bpython PySolFC-music [devel,f17,f18,f19] was orphaned by firewing Music for PySolFC https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/PySolFC-music perl-LWP-UserAgent-Determined [devel,f17,f18,f19] was orphaned by rrati A virtual browser that retries errors https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-LWP-UserAgent-Determine... PySolFC-cardsets [devel,f17,f18,f19] was orphaned by firewing Various cardsets for PySolFC https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/PySolFC-cardsets libntlm [EL-5,devel,f17,f18,f19] was orphaned by turki NTLM authentication library https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/libntlm lybniz [devel,f17,f18,f19] was orphaned by firewing A function graph plotter https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/lybniz PySolFC [devel,f17,f18,f19] was orphaned by firewing A collection of solitare card games https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/PySolFC ruby-mysql [devel] was orphaned by orion A Ruby interface to MySQL https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ruby-mysql mysql-workbench [devel] was orphaned by remi A MySQL visual database modeling, administration and querying tool https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/mysql-workbench be [EL-5,EL-6,devel,f17,f18,f19] was orphaned by salimma Bugs Everywhere, a distributed bug tracker https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/be perl-Net-Amazon-S3 [devel,f17,f18,f19] was orphaned by rrati Use the Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Net-Amazon-S3 gkrellm-timestamp [devel,f17,f18,f19] was orphaned by turki UNIX timestamp clock plugin for GKrellM https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/gkrellm-timestamp libgsasl [EL-5,EL-6,devel,f17,f18,f19] was orphaned by turki GNU SASL library https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/libgsasl firmware-extract [EL-5,EL-6,devel,f17,f18,f19] was orphaned by mdomsch A firmware-tools plugin to add firmware extraction from vendor binaries https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/firmware-extract
4 packages unorphaned --------------------- msrb unorphaned : felix-bundlerepository [f17] apevec unorphaned : python-passlib [EL-6] abompard unorphaned : python-storm [f18] strobert unorphaned : rsnapshot [f18]
3 packages changed owner ------------------------ limb gave to rjones : unison240 [EL-6] limb gave to gwei3 : jersey [EL-6] petersen gave to goldmann : mimepull [EL-6]
Hello All.
2013/7/8 nobody@fedoraproject.org:
Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
19 packages were orphaned
msmtp [EL-5,devel,f17,f18,f19] was orphaned by turki SMTP client https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/msmtp
I'm using it, so I'm taking this.
libgsasl [EL-5,EL-6,devel,f17,f18,f19] was orphaned by turki GNU SASL library https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/libgsasl
erlang-esasl depends on this so I'll take it.
-- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
Dne 8.7.2013 12:00, nobody@fedoraproject.org napsal(a):
ruby-mysql [devel] was orphaned by orion A Ruby interface to MySQL https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ruby-mysql
Was this intentional? There is no replacement to this package in Fedora yet, nor it was correctly deprecated.
On 07/09/2013 12:16 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 8.7.2013 12:00, nobody@fedoraproject.org napsal(a):
ruby-mysql [devel] was orphaned by orion A Ruby interface to MySQL https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ruby-mysql
Was this intentional? There is no replacement to this package in Fedora yet, nor it was correctly deprecated.
Nothing uses it that I can see. rubygem-mysql2 is under review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974889
and that should be used going forward.
If someone really wants to resurrect this, I would suggest using this:
http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/rubygem-mysql-2.9.1-1.fc19.src.rpm
Dne 9.7.2013 17:52, Orion Poplawski napsal(a):
On 07/09/2013 12:16 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 8.7.2013 12:00, nobody@fedoraproject.org napsal(a):
ruby-mysql [devel] was orphaned by orion A Ruby interface to MySQL https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ruby-mysql
Was this intentional? There is no replacement to this package in Fedora yet, nor it was correctly deprecated.
Nothing uses it that I can see.
That is like claiming nothing uses Ruby on Rails we ship in Fedora or nothing uses LibreOffice
rubygem-mysql2 is under review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974889
and that should be used going forward.
Yes, it is ... but if you suggest that is should be used, it should probably obsolete ruby-mysql and that should be coordinated with rubygem-mysql2 maintainer. I am not aware of such suggestion.
If someone really wants to resurrect this, I would suggest using this:
http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/rubygem-mysql-2.9.1-1.fc19.src.rpm
BTW if you really like to retire ruby-mysql, you should do it properly at least, click on "retire package" in pkgdb is not enough. You should do step 2 from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Vít
On 07/10/2013 11:05 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 9.7.2013 17:52, Orion Poplawski napsal(a):
On 07/09/2013 12:16 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 8.7.2013 12:00, nobody@fedoraproject.org napsal(a):
ruby-mysql [devel] was orphaned by orion A Ruby interface to MySQL https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ruby-mysql
Was this intentional? There is no replacement to this package in Fedora yet, nor it was correctly deprecated.
Nothing uses it that I can see.
That is like claiming nothing uses Ruby on Rails we ship in Fedora or nothing uses LibreOffice
true. Sorry, I should have announced my intent to orphan/retire before.
rubygem-mysql2 is under review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974889
and that should be used going forward.
Yes, it is ... but if you suggest that is should be used, it should probably obsolete ruby-mysql and that should be coordinated with rubygem-mysql2 maintainer. I am not aware of such suggestion.
It is a different api I believe, so it really can't obsolete/provide ruby-mysql.
If someone really wants to resurrect this, I would suggest using this:
http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/rubygem-mysql-2.9.1-1.fc19.src.rpm
BTW if you really like to retire ruby-mysql, you should do it properly at least, click on "retire package" in pkgdb is not enough. You should do step 2 from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Vít
Oops, I had, but forgot to git push. Too used to fedpkg commit -p I guess.
Dne 11.7.2013 16:09, Orion Poplawski napsal(a):
rubygem-mysql2 is under review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974889
and that should be used going forward.
Yes, it is ... but if you suggest that is should be used, it should probably obsolete ruby-mysql and that should be coordinated with rubygem-mysql2 maintainer. I am not aware of such suggestion.
It is a different api I believe, so it really can't obsolete/provide ruby-mysql.
Hmm, that is good point. On the other hand, from my POV, ruby-mysql or rubygem-mysql2, both are typically used by ActiveRecord and ActiveRecord supports both. This is a bit unfortunate situation :/
Vít
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 10:00:04AM +0000, nobody@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
To whoever is creating these messages: Please add a message about who is responsible for these reports, where to report bugs and where the sources of the script can be found.
Thank you Till
On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 18:06 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 10:00:04AM +0000, nobody@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
To whoever is creating these messages:
That would be me (and infra)
Please add a message about who is responsible for these reports, where to report bugs
Sounds good.
and where the sources of the script can be found.
That would be there: https://github.com/pypingou/fedora-owner-change
Pierre
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 06:56:03PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 18:06 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
and where the sources of the script can be found.
That would be there: https://github.com/pypingou/fedora-owner-change
Thank you. Have you considered moving this to the fedoraproject infrastructure github project? See: https://github.com/fedora-infra
Regards Till
On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 18:06 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 10:00:04AM +0000, nobody@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
To whoever is creating these messages: Please add a message about who is responsible for these reports, where to report bugs and where the sources of the script can be found.
From next week the report will have a link to the sources (the git
repo).
Pierre
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 10:00:04AM +0000, nobody@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
How about changing the report time to to last 48-216 hours, then ongoing ownership transfers would be recognised as long as they happen within 48 hours.
Regards Till
On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 18:23 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 10:00:04AM +0000, nobody@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
How about changing the report time to to last 48-216 hours, then ongoing ownership transfers would be recognised as long as they happen within 48 hours.
168 hours is a week, so ownership transfer should be picked if they happen within a week. You would like to have it down to 48h or up to 216h?
The problem is to not become to spammy while remaining informative, so we went for 1 week, this can be adjusted of course.
Pierre
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 07:01:12PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 18:23 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 10:00:04AM +0000, nobody@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
How about changing the report time to to last 48-216 hours, then ongoing ownership transfers would be recognised as long as they happen within 48 hours.
168 hours is a week, so ownership transfer should be picked if they happen within a week. You would like to have it down to 48h or up to 216h?
Actually I was incorrect. I would like it to report orphaned packages in the time frame from 48 hours ago until 216 hours ago (which is again a week), but report packages that have been picked up again in between today to 48 hours ago as transfered from one owner to another.
With the current setup, if a package was orphaned shortly before the script ran and claimed shortly afterwards, this will not be shown as a simple transfer but as orphaning and adopting.
It irritated me that mstmp was reported as being orphaned, because I noticed that its ownership was transfered recently.
Regards Till
-
Nobody -
Orion Poplawski -
Peter Lemenkov -
Pierre-Yves Chibon -
Till Maas -
Vít Ondruch