.. is under way:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239227
Shouldn't take more than a day or two, with any luck!
In terms of the new version, nothing much to see here. There a three important regressions that are fixed, and one breaking change that is unlikely to be noticed:
https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/ocaml-5-1-1-released/13592
Rich.
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 10:28:29PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
.. is under way:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239227
Shouldn't take more than a day or two, with any luck!
In terms of the new version, nothing much to see here. There a three important regressions that are fixed, and one breaking change that is unlikely to be noticed:
This is complete. Some packages failed to build, because of an apparent bug in the OCaml toolchain:
https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/issues/12820
These were:
- libguestfs - libnbd
and these which have the above packages as dependencies:
- guestfs-tools - nbdkit - virt-v2v
I'll fix them separately once the above bug has been resolved.
Rich.
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 10:18:03AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 10:28:29PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
.. is under way:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239227
Shouldn't take more than a day or two, with any luck!
In terms of the new version, nothing much to see here. There a three important regressions that are fixed, and one breaking change that is unlikely to be noticed:
This is complete. Some packages failed to build, because of an apparent bug in the OCaml toolchain:
https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/issues/12820
These were:
- libguestfs
- libnbd
and these which have the above packages as dependencies:
- guestfs-tools
- nbdkit
- virt-v2v
I'll fix them separately once the above bug has been resolved.
These are done now, bar waiting for a couple of builds to complete.
Rich.
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 11:46:58AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
These are done now, bar waiting for a couple of builds to complete.
... or so we thought.
It turns out that Jerry James identified a code generation bug on s390x:
https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/issues/12829
which is fixed upstream in:
https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/pull/12831
We may need to rebuild either just OCaml or potentially all OCaml packages (in a side tag). I'll try to get this done today.
Rich.
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 10:48:18AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 11:46:58AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
These are done now, bar waiting for a couple of builds to complete.
... or so we thought.
It turns out that Jerry James identified a code generation bug on s390x:
https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/issues/12829
which is fixed upstream in:
https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/pull/12831
We may need to rebuild either just OCaml or potentially all OCaml packages (in a side tag). I'll try to get this done today.
Actually it's all of them since this alters generated code potentially in any s390x package.
Rich.
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 10:50:11AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 10:48:18AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 11:46:58AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
These are done now, bar waiting for a couple of builds to complete.
... or so we thought.
It turns out that Jerry James identified a code generation bug on s390x:
https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/issues/12829
which is fixed upstream in:
https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/pull/12831
We may need to rebuild either just OCaml or potentially all OCaml packages (in a side tag). I'll try to get this done today.
Actually it's all of them since this alters generated code potentially in any s390x package.
The second rebuild is now done.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-5a1287b99c
Rich.