Hello all,
I'm not going to orphan these packages, but I would like to find co-maintainers for any and all of them as I find myself with less and less time to give them the full attention they need.
For anyone that does decide to take these on, I would be happy to let you take the lead with the package.
Here's a summary of the packages I maintain that do not currently have a co-maintainer:
* bit * clips * clipsmm * conexus * dbus-cxx * gimpfx-foundry * nqc * papyrus * tetex-IEEEtran * xournal
---
Rick
I'm not going to orphan these packages, but I would like to find co-maintainers for any and all of them as I find myself with less and less time to give them the full attention they need. [...]
- dbus-cxx
With the addition of GDbus in Glib, is dbus-cxx still needed? People should directly use the C++ bindings from glibmm, shouldn't they?
Regards, Debarshi
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Debarshi Ray wrote:
With the addition of GDbus in Glib, is dbus-cxx still needed? People should directly use the C++ bindings from glibmm, shouldn't they?
Not everyone uses GLibâ¦
Which is actually dbus-cxx' raison d'être.
That, and the skeleton generator from the introspected XML...