i can find anywhere, was removed? if so, why?
On Feb 14, 2005, Patricio Bruna V pbruna@linuxcenterla.com wrote:
i can find anywhere, was removed? if so, why?
Posting once is supposed to be enough, even if it takes one or two hours to trigger a response :-)
IIRC it was temporarily removed because it was found to modify the filesystem in such a way that a later fsck could destroy the contents of the filesystem. I think there's probably a bugzilla about it.
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:52:25 -0300, Patricio Bruna V pbruna@linuxcenterla.com wrote:
i can find anywhere, was removed? if so, why?
rpm -q --changelog e2fsprogs
* Wed Feb 09 2005 Thomas Woerner twoerner@redhat.com 1.35-12 - rebuild
* Wed Dec 22 2004 Stephen C. Tweedie sct@redhat.com - Disable offline resize for now: resize2fs is incompatible with online resize, and can result in corrupt filesystems.
ext2online is available however.
-jef
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 01:09:05PM -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:52:25 -0300, Patricio Bruna V pbruna@linuxcenterla.com wrote:
i can find anywhere, was removed? if so, why?
rpm -q --changelog e2fsprogs
- Wed Feb 09 2005 Thomas Woerner twoerner@redhat.com 1.35-12
- rebuild
- Wed Dec 22 2004 Stephen C. Tweedie sct@redhat.com
- Disable offline resize for now: resize2fs is incompatible with online resize, and can result in corrupt filesystems.
ext2online is available however.
I'm still waiting for an answer to my question "ext2resize vs resize2fs" on fedora-test-list @ 05/02/01.
So, in this case, would ext2resize work better than resize2fs?
Regards, Luciano Rocha
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 06:21:24PM +0000, Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha wrote:
I'm still waiting for an answer to my question "ext2resize vs resize2fs" on fedora-test-list @ 05/02/01.
So, in this case, would ext2resize work better than resize2fs?
See http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?w=2&r=1&s=e2fsck+1.36-rc1&q=t
Regards,
Bill Rugolsky