On Ter, 2013-03-19 at 14:29 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 11:26 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 14:14 -0400, John.Florian(a)dart.biz wrote:
> > > From: Adam Williamson <awilliam(a)redhat.com>
> > >
> > > On 19/03/13 08:30 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 19 Mar 2013 14:33, <John.Florian(a)dart.biz
> > > > <mailto:John.Florian@dart.biz>> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > From: "Richard W.M. Jones"
<rjones(a)redhat.com
> > > > <mailto:rjones@redhat.com>>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > An interesting question is: Why don't we try out the
new
> > release name
> > > > > > early on in Rawhide. ie. we would change the release
name
> > now to
> > > > > > whatever F20 is going to be + " (Rawhide)".
Wouldn't that
> > give us a
> > > > > > lot more time to test and fix?
> > > > >
> > > > > That seems like a great idea ... and it also adds in a test
for
> > > > handling parenthesis. I can't imagine how they'd pose a
problem,
> > but
> > > > clearly nobody foresaw this train coming either.
> > > >
> > > > Err the fedora 19 voting for names started around the release of
> > F18
> > > > alpha. Its been set as this for around 6 months already, I suspect
> > its
> > > > only become an issue with people starting to create images etc.
> > >
> > > It isn't applied anywhere till branch. Rawhide always uses the
> > release
> > > name 'Rawhide'. Even though it's voted on a long way ahead of
time,
> > the
> > > new release name is only applied in the tree at branch time.
> > Several
> > > people were using Rawhide considerably in advance of branching -
> > > including myself - and the problems showed up right when we branched
> > and
> > > the new fedora-release package was rolled.
> >
> > Ah, that makes sense. I had no idea how feasible name + "
(Rawhide)"
> > would be, I just liked the idea.
>
> It's an interesting idea, but I suspect it may break rather more stuff
> than people expect :) Be neat to try though, and Rawhide is certainly
> the place to break it.
I vote for Räwh'de myself :-)
hi, state my point of view , my last email just go to Chris Murphy
thing is, we introduce one ö (my keyboard don't have it) is like what I
have to leave with my é of Sérgio and one apostrophe , so cases complete
different. I bet ö will give much more problems .
I'm not saying to forget the bug, I'm saying: hey, this introduce a
bug , so first, we roll-back, second we fix the bug and third when bug
or bugs are fixed , we put release name with "what ever we want"
Cheers,
--
Sérgio M. B.