I installed F-11 fedora-release* and did yum clean all ; yum update
I got YumRepo Error: All mirror URLs are not using ftp, http[s] or file.
This is a fully updated F-10 system. Manually filling in releasever and basearch in fedora.repo for basearch and mirrorlist make no difference. Something up?
-J
2009/6/9 Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net:
I installed F-11 fedora-release* and did yum clean all ; yum update
I got YumRepo Error: All mirror URLs are not using ftp, http[s] or file.
This is a fully updated F-10 system. Manually filling in releasever and basearch in fedora.repo for basearch and mirrorlist make no difference. Something up?
There was a message a few days ago that the mirrormanager would be broken for the F-11 repos for a few days, so perhaps it is that. You could try editing your yum repo files to point to a specific mirror rather than the mirror manager and see if that works.
HTH, J
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:17 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
I installed F-11 fedora-release* and did yum clean all ; yum update
I got YumRepo Error: All mirror URLs are not using ftp, http[s] or file.
This is a fully updated F-10 system. Manually filling in releasever and basearch in fedora.repo for basearch and mirrorlist make no difference. Something up?
See https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2009-June/msg00783.html , if you have the same line that says "Eg. </metalink>/", then I think that's the solution.
Jonathan
Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:17 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
I installed F-11 fedora-release* and did yum clean all ; yum update
I got YumRepo Error: All mirror URLs are not using ftp, http[s] or file.
This is a fully updated F-10 system. Manually filling in releasever and basearch in fedora.repo for basearch and mirrorlist make no difference. Something up?
See https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2009-June/msg00783.html , if you have the same line that says "Eg. </metalink>/", then I think that's the solution.
Jonathan
That's my error, but that doesn't help. yum-3.2.21-2.fc10.noarch.
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:37 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:17 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
I installed F-11 fedora-release* and did yum clean all ; yum update
I got YumRepo Error: All mirror URLs are not using ftp, http[s] or file.
This is a fully updated F-10 system. Manually filling in releasever and basearch in fedora.repo for basearch and mirrorlist make no difference. Something up?
See https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2009-June/msg00783.html , if you have the same line that says "Eg. </metalink>/", then I think that's the solution.
Jonathan
That's my error, but that doesn't help. yum-3.2.21-2.fc10.noarch.
Easiest thing to do is probably just get the yum from Fed-10 updates-testing, which is 3.2.23 and understands metalink and metalink as mirrorlist.
James Antill wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:37 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:17 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
I installed F-11 fedora-release* and did yum clean all ; yum update
I got YumRepo Error: All mirror URLs are not using ftp, http[s] or file.
This is a fully updated F-10 system. Manually filling in releasever and basearch in fedora.repo for basearch and mirrorlist make no difference. Something up?
See https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2009-June/msg00783.html , if you have the same line that says "Eg. </metalink>/", then I think that's the solution.
Jonathan
That's my error, but that doesn't help. yum-3.2.21-2.fc10.noarch.
Easiest thing to do is probably just get the yum from Fed-10 updates-testing, which is 3.2.23 and understands metalink and metalink as mirrorlist.
Success! I trust this will be pushed to F-10 stable with a quickness?
Thanks all,
-J
Jon Ciesla wrote:
James Antill wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:37 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:17 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
I installed F-11 fedora-release* and did yum clean all ; yum update
I got YumRepo Error: All mirror URLs are not using ftp, http[s] or file.
This is a fully updated F-10 system. Manually filling in releasever and basearch in fedora.repo for basearch and mirrorlist make no difference. Something up?
See https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2009-June/msg00783.html , if you have the same line that says "Eg. </metalink>/", then I think that's the solution.
Jonathan
That's my error, but that doesn't help. yum-3.2.21-2.fc10.noarch.
Easiest thing to do is probably just get the yum from Fed-10 updates-testing, which is 3.2.23 and understands metalink and metalink as mirrorlist.
Success! I trust this will be pushed to F-10 stable with a quickness?
Thanks all,
-J
Of course, now we have dependency problems, that --skip-broken won't touch. . .
Error: Missing Dependency: libcrypto.so.7 is needed by package nx-3.3.0-33.fc10.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: libcrypto.so.7 is needed by package ntp-4.2.4p7-1.fc10.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: python(abi) = 2.5 is needed by package yum-3.2.23-3.fc10.noarch (installed)
Normally I'd remove the offending packages, but I sorta need yum. . .and openssl. . .
Any suggestions?
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 14:55 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Jon Ciesla wrote:
James Antill wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:37 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:17 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
I installed F-11 fedora-release* and did yum clean all ; yum update
I got YumRepo Error: All mirror URLs are not using ftp, http[s] or file.
This is a fully updated F-10 system. Manually filling in releasever and basearch in fedora.repo for basearch and mirrorlist make no difference. Something up?
See https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2009-June/msg00783.html , if you have the same line that says "Eg. </metalink>/", then I think that's the solution.
Jonathan
That's my error, but that doesn't help. yum-3.2.21-2.fc10.noarch.
Easiest thing to do is probably just get the yum from Fed-10 updates-testing, which is 3.2.23 and understands metalink and metalink as mirrorlist.
Success! I trust this will be pushed to F-10 stable with a quickness?
Thanks all,
-J
Of course, now we have dependency problems, that --skip-broken won't touch. . .
Error: Missing Dependency: libcrypto.so.7 is needed by package nx-3.3.0-33.fc10.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: libcrypto.so.7 is needed by package ntp-4.2.4p7-1.fc10.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: python(abi) = 2.5 is needed by package yum-3.2.23-3.fc10.noarch (installed)
Normally I'd remove the offending packages, but I sorta need yum. . .and openssl. . .
Any suggestions?
The yum in Fed-11 updates-testing is yum-3.2.23-3.fc11.noarch.rpm, which is newer than the one in Fed-10 updates-testing. Given you are trying to update via. yum, just enabling updates-testing should be the most fun :). Or you can always just download the above yum, and use yum shell to update everything else and yum via. the local file.
Or there is always preupgrade, which is the suppor^W less fun way to do it :).
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 14:55 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Jon Ciesla wrote:
James Antill wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:37 -0500, Jon Ciesla
wrote:
Jonathan Dieter
wrote:
On Tue,
2009-06-09 at 11:17 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> I installed F-11
fedora-release* and did yum clean all ; yum
update
> > I got
YumRepo Error: All mirror URLs are not using ftp, http[s] or
file.
> > This is a fully updated F-10 system.
Manually filling in
> releasever and
basearch in fedora.repo for basearch and mirrorlist
make no difference. Something up?
See
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2009-June/msg00783.html
, if you have
the same line that says "Eg. </metalink>/", then I think
that's
the solution.
Jonathan
That's my error, but that doesn't help.
yum-3.2.21-2.fc10.noarch.
Easiest thing to do is probably just get
the yum from Fed-10
updates-testing, which is
3.2.23 and understands metalink and
metalink
as mirrorlist.
Success! I trust this will be pushed to F-10 stable with
a quickness?
Thanks all,
-J
Of
course, now we have dependency problems, that --skip-broken won't
touch. . .
Error: Missing
Dependency: libcrypto.so.7 is needed by package
nx-3.3.0-33.fc10.i386 (installed)
Error: Missing Dependency:
libcrypto.so.7 is needed by package
ntp-4.2.4p7-1.fc10.i386
(installed)
Error: Missing Dependency: python(abi) = 2.5 is
needed by package
yum-3.2.23-3.fc10.noarch (installed)
Normally I'd remove the offending packages, but I
sorta need yum. . .and
openssl. . .
Any suggestions?
The yum in Fed-11
updates-testing is yum-3.2.23-3.fc11.noarch.rpm,
which is newer
than the one in Fed-10 updates-testing. Given you are
trying to
update via. yum, just enabling updates-testing should be the
most fun :). Or you can always just download the above yum, and use yum
shell to update everything else and yum via. the local file.
And how do I install an F-11 yum RPM in F-10, which lacks python 2.6? I get the same thing with or without updates-testing for F-11.
Preupgrade isn't a very good option for some of my hosts, due to lack of X and restrictions on downtime. Yum Should Work if all the deps and EVRs are right. :)
Or there is
always preupgrade, which is the suppor^W less fun way to do
it
:).
-- James Antill
Fedora
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 20:22 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Given you are trying to update via. yum, just enabling updates-testing should be the most fun :). Or you can always just download the above yum, and use yum shell to update everything else and yum via. the local file.
And how do I install an F-11 yum RPM in F-10, which lacks python 2.6? I get the same thing with or without updates-testing for F-11.
As I said:
1. yum upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
2. yumdownloader --repoid=updates-testing yum cat <<EOL | yum shell upgrade install yum-3.2.23-3.fc11.noarch.rpm run EOL
#1 means you'll get all the other updates from updates-testing, #2 is more typing.
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 23:30:37 -0400, James wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 20:22 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Given you are trying to update via. yum, just enabling updates-testing should be the most fun :). Or you can always just download the above yum, and use yum shell to update everything else and yum via. the local file.
And how do I install an F-11 yum RPM in F-10, which lacks python 2.6? I get the same thing with or without updates-testing for F-11.
As I said:
yum upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
yumdownloader --repoid=updates-testing yum cat <<EOL | yum shell
upgrade install yum-3.2.23-3.fc11.noarch.rpm run EOL
#1 means you'll get all the other updates from updates-testing, #2 is more typing.
In #2 one also needs --enablerepo=updates-testing instead of --repoid=... and one must be very careful with typos. If Yum cannot find the packages given to it via "install", it fails badly with an interrupted transaction and (in case of F10 => F11) an unreadible RPM DB that needs manual repair.
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 23:30:37 -0400, James wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 20:22 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Given you are trying to update via. yum, just enabling updates-testing should be the most fun :). Or you can always just download the above yum, and use yum shell to update everything else and yum via. the local file.
And how do I install an F-11 yum RPM in F-10, which lacks python 2.6? I get the same thing with or without updates-testing for F-11.
As I said:
yum upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
yumdownloader --repoid=updates-testing yum cat <<EOL | yum shell
upgrade install yum-3.2.23-3.fc11.noarch.rpm run EOL
#1 means you'll get all the other updates from updates-testing, #2 is more typing.
In #2 one also needs --enablerepo=updates-testing instead of --repoid=... and one must be very careful with typos. If Yum cannot find the packages given to it via "install", it fails badly with an interrupted transaction and (in case of F10 => F11) an unreadible RPM DB that needs manual repair.
Thanks for the suggestions. However the first fails as before, and the second fails due to libvte being broken, which I understand is being fixed.
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:08:00 -0500, Jon wrote:
yum upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
yumdownloader --repoid=updates-testing yum cat <<EOL | yum shell
upgrade install yum-3.2.23-3.fc11.noarch.rpm run EOL
#1 means you'll get all the other updates from updates-testing, #2 is more typing.
In #2 one also needs --enablerepo=updates-testing instead of --repoid=... and one must be very careful with typos. If Yum cannot find the packages given to it via "install", it fails badly with an interrupted transaction and (in case of F10 => F11) an unreadible RPM DB that needs manual repair.
Thanks for the suggestions. However the first fails as before, and the second fails due to libvte being broken, which I understand is being fixed.
For #2 you need to _disable_ updates-testing, that's why you enable it only for yumdownloader. Due to the vte breakage you cannot enable it permanently for the upgrade, but you also need the newer ntp* packages from updates-testing. The release of F11 could have been much smoother for those who upgrade via Yum. Violated upgrade paths are bad.
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:08:00 -0500, Jon wrote:
yum upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
yumdownloader --repoid=updates-testing yum cat <<EOL | yum shell
upgrade install yum-3.2.23-3.fc11.noarch.rpm run EOL
#1 means you'll get all the other updates from updates-testing, #2 is more typing.
In #2 one also needs --enablerepo=updates-testing instead of --repoid=... and one must be very careful with typos. If Yum cannot find the packages given to it via "install", it fails badly with an interrupted transaction and (in case of F10 => F11) an unreadible RPM DB that needs manual repair.
Thanks for the suggestions. However the first fails as before, and the second fails due to libvte being broken, which I understand is being fixed.
For #2 you need to _disable_ updates-testing, that's why you enable it only for yumdownloader. Due to the vte breakage you cannot enable it permanently for the upgrade, but you also need the newer ntp* packages from updates-testing. The release of F11 could have been much smoother for those who upgrade via Yum. Violated upgrade paths are bad.
Agreed.
For #2, my attempt was with updates-testing disabled. I've tried yumdownloading the ntp and nx packages and adding lines for those, and yum shell fails the same way yum did.
Jon Ciesla wrote:
I installed F-11 fedora-release* and did yum clean all ; yum update
I got YumRepo Error: All mirror URLs are not using ftp, http[s] or file. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498720 This is a fully updated F-10 system. Manually filling in releasever and basearch in fedora.repo for basearch and mirrorlist make no difference. Something up?
Sound like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498720
Ralf
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Jon Ciesla wrote:
I installed F-11 fedora-release* and did yum clean all ; yum update
I got YumRepo Error: All mirror URLs are not using ftp, http[s] or file. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498720 This is a fully updated F-10 system. Manually filling in releasever and basearch in fedora.repo for basearch and mirrorlist make no difference. Something up?
Sound like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498720
Ralf
Looks like it. Just not sure how to remedy this, as the F-11 version needs Python 2.6. . .rebuilding 1.1.2-12 for F-10 and upgrading did not fix it.
-
James Antill -
Jon Ciesla -
Jonathan Dieter -
Jonathan Underwood -
Michael Schwendt -
Ralf Corsepius