Trying to build a new Asterisk package in rawhide this morning I'm getting this: DEBUG backend.py:745: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/dist-f15-build-966033-145591/root/ groupinstall build DEBUG util.py:281: Executing command: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/dist-f15-build-966033-145591/root/ groupinstall build DEBUG util.py:247: Error: Package: 4:perl-5.12.3-149.fc15.x86_64 (build) DEBUG util.py:247: Requires: perl(Tk::Pod) DEBUG util.py:247: You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem DEBUG util.py:247: Error: Package: 4:perl-5.12.3-149.fc15.x86_64 (build) DEBUG util.py:247: Requires: perl(Mac::InternetConfig) DEBUG util.py:247: Error: Package: perl-CPAN-1.9402-149.fc15.noarch (build) DEBUG util.py:247: Requires: perl(Mac::BuildTools) DEBUG util.py:247: You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest DEBUG util.py:320: Child returncode was: 1 Full info here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2743524 I don't think it's just me as I've seen a couple of other failed builds in Koji with the same problem: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2743531 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2743521

So is Perl still broken? I'm getting lots of emails like: vhostmd-0.4-11.fc14.x86_64 requires /usr/bin/perl vhostmd-0.4-11.fc14.x86_64 requires perl(strict)

On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:04:45AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Yes, perl was broken. I have untagged it and notified the maintainer > (who was already looking at it). > > Things should work again as soon as the buildroot rebuilds. So is Perl still broken? I'm getting lots of emails like: vhostmd-0.4-11.fc14.x86_64 requires /usr/bin/perl vhostmd-0.4-11.fc14.x86_64 requires perl(strict) Rich.

On 01/26/2011 05:58 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > Trying to build a new Asterisk package in rawhide this morning I'm getting this:

> Full info here: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2743524 > > I don't think it's just me It's not only a couple of broken builds, seems as if perl in rawhide now is really f***ed up: The perl-devel list currently is filling up with Broken Dependency mails for each perl module: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/perl-devel/2011-January/date.html as well as all perl-module maintainer is being notified by PM. No idea what might have happened, but something has gone utterly wrong, somewhere - I so far have received ca. 1400 "Broken deps" mails ... :(

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 02:34:53PM +0100, Jan Safranek wrote: > On related note, there seems to be something wrong with krb5, I've got > following notice: > > wireshark has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: > On x86_64: > wireshark-1.4.3-2.fc15.x86_64 requires > libk5crypto.so.3(k5crypto_3_MIT)(64bit) > wireshark-1.4.3-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libkrb5.so.3(krb5_3_MIT)(64bit) > wireshark-1.4.3-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libk5crypto.so.3()(64bit) > wireshark-1.4.3-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libkrb5.so.3()(64bit) > > Did I miss soname bump? I touched it last, and no, you did not. I pulled down the x86_64 builds from yesterday to have a look. RPM didn't complain when I applied them to my system manually, and the krb5-libs package still claims to provide those shared libraries with those versions. So, yeah, this is confusing to me as well.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk1BhAQACgkQeiVVYja6o6PsbQCZAVufv3UIXj2eQ+gVE8H6CzPw IFQAn2m4uyXwCi5I3PK15r6jmMUi/S42 =5xXr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

So, yeah, this is confusing to me as well.