Richard W.M. Jones wrote, at 01/27/2011 09:51 PM +9:00:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:04:45AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Yes, perl was broken. I have untagged it and notified the maintainer
> (who was already looking at it).
>
> Things should work again as soon as the buildroot rebuilds.
So is Perl still broken? I'm getting lots of emails like:
vhostmd-0.4-11.fc14.x86_64 requires /usr/bin/perl
vhostmd-0.4-11.fc14.x86_64 requires perl(strict)
Rich.
I received mails about broken deps not only on perl, like:
On i386:
mfiler3-4.2.1-1.fc15.i686 requires saphire >= 0:1.1.8
mfiler3-4.2.1-1.fc15.i686 requires libsaphire.so.1
On i386:
rubygem-mechanize-1.0.1-0.1.beta.20110107104205.fc15.noarch requires
rubygem(net-http-persistent)
So currently I guess this is not perl problem but repoclosure is
broken in some way (I don't know well)
Regards,
Mamoru