2:10 p.m.
I took over tuxpaint when Panu needed to dump a bunch of packages a
while back because my daughter *loves* it, and I thought I'd be able
to spend some time working on it (packaging the stamps, for example),
but that hasn't actually happened.
Anyway, I'd appreciate some help, either a one-time thing to get the
stamps packaged or a co-maintainer.
Steve
--
Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc.
Email: steve(a)kspei.com http://www.kspei.com/
Phone: (618)398-3000 Mobile: (618)567-7320
2:49 p.m.
Oh, and I just noticed that tuxpaint has a bunch of rpmlint warnings
right now. They look easy enough to fix, but I probably won't get to
it until after the Great Rebuild.
Again, help would be greatly appreciated.
Steve
--
Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc.
Email: steve(a)kspei.com http://www.kspei.com/
Phone: (618)398-3000 Mobile: (618)567-7320
3:26 p.m.
Steven Pritchard wrote:
I took over tuxpaint when Panu needed to dump a bunch of packages a
while back because my daughter *loves* it, and I thought I'd be able
to spend some time working on it (packaging the stamps, for example),
but that hasn't actually happened.
Anyway, I'd appreciate some help, either a one-time thing to get the
stamps packaged or a co-maintainer.
What is missing with the stamp packaging? I just built this for FC6 and
got a bunch of files put into /usr/share/tuxpaint/stamps/cartoon/tux/*
It looks like 'make install', as called from %install, already installs
the stamp files.
--Wart
3:57 p.m.
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 01:26:38PM -0700, Wart wrote:
What is missing with the stamp packaging? I just built this for FC6
and
got a bunch of files put into /usr/share/tuxpaint/stamps/cartoon/tux/*
It looks like 'make install', as called from %install, already installs
the stamp files.
But there are more stamps available in the tuxpaint-stamps archive:
http://dl.sourceforge.net/tuxpaint/tuxpaint-stamps-2005.11.25.tar.gz
Steve
--
Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc.
Email: steve(a)kspei.com http://www.kspei.com/
Phone: (618)398-3000 Mobile: (618)567-7320
6:44 p.m.
Steven Pritchard wrote:
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 01:26:38PM -0700, Wart wrote:
> What is missing with the stamp packaging? I just built this for FC6 and
> got a bunch of files put into /usr/share/tuxpaint/stamps/cartoon/tux/*
> It looks like 'make install', as called from %install, already installs
> the stamp files.
But there are more stamps available in the tuxpaint-stamps archive:
http://dl.sourceforge.net/tuxpaint/tuxpaint-stamps-2005.11.25.tar.gz
Here is a first pass at a package. Feel free to take it over and submit
it for review:
http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/queue/tuxpaint-stamps-2005.11.25-1.src...
http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/queue/tuxpaint-stamps.spec
I wasn't able to test the language translations in the package, as I
didn't see anywhere in the UI where the stamp messages appear.
rpmlint complains about the 'sv' language code being invalid, but I'm
not sure what should be used in its place. To further confuse matters,
it complains about this on a 'sw' (swahili) file:
E: tuxpaint-stamps incorrect-locale-sv
/usr/share/locale/sw/LC_MESSAGES/tuxpaint-stamps.mo
--Mike
7:58 p.m.
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 04:44:27PM -0700, Wart wrote:
Here is a first pass at a package. Feel free to take it over and
submit
it for review:
http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/queue/tuxpaint-stamps-2005.11.25-1.src...
http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/queue/tuxpaint-stamps.spec
Very nice. Thanks.
Stupid question, but did you check to see if they actually show up in
tuxpaint as additional stamps?
And now an opinion question... If we get this in, would it make sense
to have tuxpaint Require it, or should it remain optional?
Steve
--
Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc.
Email: steve(a)kspei.com http://www.kspei.com/
Phone: (618)398-3000 Mobile: (618)567-7320
8:18 p.m.
Steven Pritchard wrote:
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 04:44:27PM -0700, Wart wrote:
> Here is a first pass at a package. Feel free to take it over and submit
> it for review:
>
> http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/queue/tuxpaint-stamps-2005.11.25-1.src...
> http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/queue/tuxpaint-stamps.spec
Very nice. Thanks.
Stupid question, but did you check to see if they actually show up in
tuxpaint as additional stamps?
Yes, I did. :)
And now an opinion question... If we get this in, would it make
sense
to have tuxpaint Require it, or should it remain optional?
Due to the size of the stamp package, I would rather it be optional and
not required.
--Wart
11:25 p.m.
Wart wrote:
Steven Pritchard wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 04:44:27PM -0700, Wart wrote:
>> Here is a first pass at a package. Feel free to take it over and
>> submit it for review:
>>
>> http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/queue/tuxpaint-stamps-2005.11.25-1.src...
>>
>> http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/queue/tuxpaint-stamps.spec
>
> Very nice. Thanks.
>
> Stupid question, but did you check to see if they actually show up in
> tuxpaint as additional stamps?
Yes, I did. :)
> And now an opinion question... If we get this in, would it make sense
> to have tuxpaint Require it, or should it remain optional?
Due to the size of the stamp package, I would rather it be optional and
not required.
+1,
Regards,
Hans
4:20 p.m.
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 04:44:27PM -0700, Wart wrote:
rpmlint complains about the 'sv' language code being invalid,
but I'm
not sure what should be used in its place. To further confuse matters,
it complains about this on a 'sw' (swahili) file:
E: tuxpaint-stamps incorrect-locale-sv
/usr/share/locale/sw/LC_MESSAGES/tuxpaint-stamps.mo
Something is broken here, but I don't think it is tuxpaint-stamps.
$ rpm -qf /usr/share/locale/sv
glibc-common-2.4-8
$ rpm -qf /usr/share/locale/sw
file /usr/share/locale/sw is not owned by any package
$ rpm -qf /usr/share/locale/sw/LC_MESSAGES/*
iso-codes-0.49-1
iso-codes-0.49-1
tuxpaint-0.9.15b-1.fc5
And iso-codes is a core package. (One I've never noticed before...)
I'm guessing glibc-common *should* own /usr/share/locale/sw, but I
have nothing to back that up. Unowned directories are not cool
though...
Looking into this a little deeper, it appears to be a common problem.
$ rpm -qf /usr/share/locale/* | grep 'is not owned' | wc -l
162
I wonder if %find_lang is buggy.
In any case, I think I'm going to submit the package as-is. If it is
broken, it is no more broken that tuxpaint itself...
Steve
--
Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc.
Email: steve(a)kspei.com http://www.kspei.com/
Phone: (618)398-3000 Mobile: (618)567-7320
6448
days inactive
6451
days old
8 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Hans de Goede -
Michael Thomas -
Steven Pritchard