On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 01:57:20PM +0000, dhaval.joshi(a)nomura.com wrote:
This e-mail (including any attachments) is confidential, may contain
proprietary or privileged information and is intended for the named
recipient(s) only. Unintended recipients are prohibited from taking
action on the basis of information in this e-mail and must delete all
copies. Nomura will not accept responsibility or liability for the
accuracy or completeness of, or the presence of any virus or disabling
code in, this e-mail. If verification is sought please request a hard
copy. Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be
treated as preliminary only and subject to formal written confirmation
by Nomura. Nomura reserves the right to monitor e-mail communications
through its networks (in accordance with applicable laws). No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by Nomura by any
mistransmission of this e-mail. Any reference to "Nomura" is a
reference to any entity in the Nomura Holdings, Inc. group.
Please read our Electronic Communications Legal Notice which forms
part of this e-mail:
http://www.Nomura.com/email_disclaimer.htm
Please get rid of this disclaimer. You can not send any confidential
data to a public mailing list. Even then I think wikipedia describes its
effectiveness very well[1]:
In the USA, no court case is known to have been decided by an email
disclaimer or the lack of same. In the EU, there is a directive which
strikes down legal obligations which have been imposed and this would
make disclaimers unenforceable. Disclaimers appear to have arisen as a
result of imitation and habit rather than because they are effective. As
a result, most people no longer take them seriously.
[1]:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Email_disclaimer#Effectiveness