[Fedora-legal-list] Re: Nonfree font(s) in 90-Second-Portraits (was: Effective license analysis: required or not?)
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 12:57 PM Jeremy Newton
<mystro256(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
Yeah, I also noticed another one of my packages has a possible problematic font, but
it's unclear to me:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/safetyblanket
https://github.com/SimonLarsen/safetyblanket/blob/master/res/fonts/notalo...
For the yb.ttf, I just replaced it with another font included in the source that's
OFL in the %prep section. I assume this is sufficient?
I think so.
However, it's possible the atari.tff file is problematic too. It was
not clear to me how this was licensed even after locating a likely
origin for the file.
Richard