[Fedora-legal-list] Re: Do I merge "(A AND B) AND A" into "A AND B" or not?

Hello, during a package review I came across this License tag (simplified): License: ((Apache-2.0 OR MIT) AND BSD-3-Clause) AND (Apache-2.0 OR MIT) Where "(Apache-2.0 OR MIT) AND BSD-3-Clause" is a license of one "unit" built into the RPM and "Apache-2.0 OR MIT" is a license of another "unit". (Both units are built into a single binary if that makes a difference.) Do I change that to: License: (Apache-2.0 OR MIT) AND BSD-3-Clause Or not? I know that we are not supposed to calculate "effective license", but in my head they both mean the exact same thing.