Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Please define "effective license" (for the love of consistency)

On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote:

On Wednesday 09 December 2009, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:

...

1. I came across another review with the same license question. The

source files have one of the GPLv2, GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ headers each. They get compiled and produce 1 final binary executable. None of the headers (or other source code files) go to the final RPM.

What goes to the license tag of the package?

Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537325#c4

2. Hypothetical question (although happens rather frequently): What if

there was a -devel subpackage and .h files with different licenses ended up in this -devel subpackage?

Aren't both questions answered pretty well by https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines ?

Nope. I wouldn't ask if they were.

Orcan