V Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 06:53:41PM +0200, Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
simplification of "MIT AND (MIT OR Apache-2.0)" to just
"MIT" (since "MIT" already implies "MIT OR Apache-2.0"
It does not imply that. Apache-2.0 license requires distributing Apache-2.0
license text, while MIT does not require distributing Apache-2.0 license
text.
A practical implication: If you have a binary package with "License: MIT OR
Apache-2.0", you have to include Apache-2.0 license file with %license macro.
Omitting the file means you have breached Apache-2.0 license.
Another implication: You can reduce "MIT OR Apache-2.0" to "MIT". But
such
reduced package takes away a freedom from a recipient to choose the Apache-2.0
license.
-- Petr