Quoting David Xie (2013-02-06 16:53:57)
Dear all,
I am making a RPM package for javax.el-api, however I am not sure which license
should I use for it.
From page
http://uel.java.net/, it claims it uses license CDDL and GPLv2.
Should I add ASL 2.0 for it?
Now I am using "(CDDL or GPLv2) and ASL 2.0".
To give more context, this is related to a review we are working on[1].
Basically all source files have a CDDL+GPL license header with ASL 2.0 being
listed because they apparently based their code on apache code. I uploaded
example header to fpaste[2].
[1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907909
[2]
http://paste.stg.fedoraproject.org/3693/
--
Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky(a)redhat.com>
Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno
PGP: 7B087241
Red Hat Inc.
http://cz.redhat.com