Hi,
Omair Majid <omajid(a)redhat.com> writes:
As far as I can tell, these are the remaining licensing questions
before
we are ready to include .NET 7 in Fedora:
1. How to define the MS Patent Promise [1] in Fedora?
The discussion is continuing at
https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/103 but
there hasn't been much movement recently.
2. What to do about code that uses from StackOverflow?
It seems like someone just needs to craft the wording for an exception
and add it to the CC licenses in Fedora? More at
https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/104
Both issues above have now been resolved. Thanks, everyone!
3. What to do about the following licenses:
https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/main/src/libraries/System.Text.Reg...
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:MIT?rd=Licensing/MIT#HP_Variant
Both seem look like variants of MIT [2][3]. As folks in this thread
have helped me understand, MIT is a category under SPDX, not a single
license. Neither of these are part of the MIT SPDX identifier yet. Is
it okay to use them under the 'MIT' identifier in Fedora while they
are still being worked on the SPDX and fedora-license-data side?
There's still no progress here, but I am going to run with using the MIT
identifier for .NET, even if this exact license texts aren't in
fedora-license-data, yet.
Omair
--
PGP Key: B157A9F0 (
http://pgp.mit.edu/)
Fingerprint = 9DB5 2F0B FD3E C239 E108 E7BD DF99 7AF8 B157 A9F0